On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:07 AM, John Maddock <john@johnmaddock.co.uk>wrote:
Nicola Musatti wrote:
What makes you say that? The tests on the release branch have been
running successfully.
I'm not sure where the difference is between how the official regression tests are run and how local testing is performed. If I run bjam from the boost/status directory in a sandbox checked out from branches/release with a command line as the following:
bjam -a --v2 --dump-tests toolset=borland-6.1.0
The tests for the libraries I listed below aren't run.
Hmm, just tried:
bjam -n -a --dump-tests toolset=borland
and the libs you list do have their tests run (which doesn't mean we shouldn't merge status/Jamfile.v2 changes of course, the question is whether to do it now). Also those libs do have their test results showing up in the test matrix.
Confused yours, John.
Me too. In any case, this doesn't seem to be something to hold up the beta for, so unless I hit some other showstopper as I scan unread mail, I'm going to start building the beta today. --Beman