I'm also in support of a second review for V3. Until the discussion sparked by Daniel I was not very clear on the motivation for the current review, but Eric's proposal sounds like a perfect way to move forward. I have not used Phoenix, or even Lambda, but I do have some experience working with Proto. If/when Phoenix V3 is under review, I'll be happy to dig into the implementation details and (time permitting) write a proper review. Cheers, Patrick On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Joel de Guzman <joel@boost-consulting.com>wrote:
Daniel Walker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Joel de Guzman <joel@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
Eric's proposal solves this dilemma. I'm all for a second review. The review has proven to be sooo productive. I'm very pleased with the amount of feedback that it has generated. I enjoy reading each post and comment from such highly intelligent people and I want to have more of it, just to make sure that we are on the right track.
Excellent! So I think we may have some unanimity here, and I'm quite pleased to change my vote and join in. So...
For the record, I hereby vote to Accept Phoenix on condition of a second review before the release. :-)
Thank you!
Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost