Re: [boost] storing intrusive_ptr in atomic?!

2013/10/25 Peter Dimov

For this, you don't seem to need atomic though; atomic works just as well, doesn't it?

yes, I could use atomic but the other code tracks T* in intrusive_ptr< T > and it looks a little bit awkward if I release a raw-ponter from a smart-pointer in order to store it in a container.