on Tue Dec 25 2012, Daniel Pfeifer <daniel-AT-pfeifer-mail.de> wrote:
2012/12/26 Klaim - Joël Lamotte <mjklaim@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Daniel Pfeifer <daniel@pfeifer-mail.de
wrote:
I propose to put all three of them into the Boost.Utility repository. Comments?
It would mean that getting a specific version of one of these libraries will potentially change the version of the other libraries. As they don't seem directly related, it might not be a good idea. DVCS repositories are cheap (on space) so is there specific reasons that would make this better?
Consistency. Boost.Utility already hosts some similarly small and unrelated libaries: CallTraits, Noncopyable, Operators, EnableIf, ...
Well, there's also the possibility that these libraries should each have their own repository. That would be another way of achieving consistency. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development Training http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost