Re: [boost] [optional] get() misses optional r-value overload in contrast to operator* and value()

("I am interested in value, not in address").

Hi, I'm going a little bit off-topic here, but another possible idealistic interpretations could be as following: As a const reference extends the lifetime of an object returned by value, I'd like to (once again ideally) interpret *const auto&* as "give me the value as effective as possible", and *const auto *as "I require the value to be a copy". That trail of thought is what got me here in the beginning, and unfortunately reality does not match :/ /Viktor