David Abrahams wrote:
Okay. I guess there's no restriction on the relationships among those integers?
Correct. They are independent dimensions in an engineering experiment framework I'm developing.
The bad thing about it is that it's more verbose for the ultimate user.
Yes, you are right.
The ultimate user is more important than the designer of the client class template.
True. It's something I do want to revisit.
I'd think that the same arguments that motivated the named function parameters library would motivate a named template parameters library.
Unless the syntax turned out to be too unwieldy.
Right. Which is where the feedback part comes in. :)
One last thing: I bet the named function parameters library and the named template parameters library could be made to share most of the same core machinery.
Possibly. Any development notes available (besides list archives, that is)? -Dave