31 Aug
2007
31 Aug
'07
4:17 p.m.
On 8/31/07, John Maddock <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> wrote:
Looks like I quashed most of the problems, but still missed a few, also looks like expl is inaccurate on that platform? Can you check what std::exp(-8072.0L) evaluates to: should be 2.371057450122979885196291188186517859e-3506 according to functions.wolfram.com.
It's: 2.371057450122979876482639519674937e-3506 Best regards, Stjepan