Le Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:02:09 +0200, Klaim - Joël Lamotte <mjklaim@gmail.com> a écrit :
I have a suggestion: Having tests that check compatibility of Tweener with Boost.Geometry would be very nice.
I am not exactly sure about this because I didn't use Boost.Geometry yet but I was thinking about trying it instead of writing my own spatial position types (for non-graphic purposes). It seems to me that Boost.Geometry concepts would work well with your library.
It seems interesting indeed. I have just finished the templatization and I wrote a sample program that applies a tweener to a structure representing a coordinate. It works :) The single_tweener class is templatized with the vector type V and and the associated scalar type S. It needs the following operators: V operator+( V, V ); V operator-( V, V ); V operator*( S, V ); I had a quick look at Boost.Geometry and I am not sure that those operators are always defined for the point concept. I will need to look further at this library. Also, it would be nice if the type S could be determined from V. My next step will be to write the documentation of the library, to make the test programs to run with Boost.test and to have a look at Boost.Geometry. Julien Jorge