Tobias Schwinger wrote:
Feel free to ask me if you need some testing -- I currently have a little BCC farm installed (5.5.0, 5.5.1, 5.6.4, 5.6.5).
Thanks. The Borland bug we are trying to work around can be seen in the following example: namespace A { struct duplicate {}; } namespace B { using namespace A; struct duplicate {}; } The compiler will erroneously complain that B::duplicate is a redefinition of A::duplicate. In this case, the using namesspace boost; inside namespace boost_132 is causing duplicates of the shared_ptr classes, which are #included inside Test library. The patch I gave yesterday solved the problem for me, I am not sure why it does not work for Robert. I am now looking for more places I might have missed namespace using directives. If you can apply my patch and try the shared_ptr_132 tests, I'd be interested in the results. -- AlisdairM