Re: [boost] Improving review process

vicente.botet wrote:

IMO, one of the author's role is to look for a review manager

I'd just like to insert a small note of caution, that the review manager needs to be somewhat neutral about the library being reviewed. Having the library author choose their review manager makes it more likely that they will select someone who is predisposed in their favour. Ideally we would have multiple candidates for each post and the wizards would choose someone based on their domain expertise. In the absence of a queue of suitable candidates, of course it's fine for the library author to encourage people - but I would prefer for that to happen in public. Phil.