Rene Rivera <grafik.list@redshift-software.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> writes:
David Abrahams writes:
I only see linux tests at http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/
What about Win32? Weren't there other platforms, also?
Of course. Boost-wide reports have them all (http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer, as per the links at the top of the page you've cited), but you surely know that (?). No, I really didn't.
What does it mean that I only see those linux tests on the front page?
It means that Martin is the only tester that is also posting the results to the boost.org/regression-results location. Everyone else is posting the only to the metacomm aggregator. Although when I'm actively running tests, near release time, I also post them to both places :-)
Okay, we have to fix that. This is just confusing. I really thought we had already decided that there was no reason to post two different result formats. Is there any reason to keep the non-metacomm format up there? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com