Re: [boost] review request: addition to type_traits library of is_less_comparable<T, U> and others

7 Dec 2009


      On Dec 6, 2009, at 5:17 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
...
The first proposed name
for type traits checking only for existence and the second name for
type traits checking for existence and standard behaviour, i.e. the
operator returns non void convertible to something the user can supply
as template parameter (default bool for comparison operators).
Nit: structural/syntactic elements like the function's return type should not be confused with behavioral/semantic ones.

--
David Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://boostpro.com