16 May
2014
16 May
'14
11:04 a.m.
Rob Stewart wrote:
A more reasonable conclusion is that Boost wants to get its head above water, following the Git transition, before taking on more disruptive changes. Nevertheless, it would be easier to accept such a change add part of a new and separate branch.
That's indeed reasonable thing to do, but it's not what Niall suggested (which is what I was responding to). Thanks, Steve.