Re: [boost] [review] Fast track formal review of Forward library begins today

Hi Eric,

Good. I can think of a couple of missing features.

- An option to handle const and non-const arguments up to N, and only [non-]const arguments from N to M.

Could you please expand on this?

- Automatically detect if the compiler supports variadic templates and rvalue references and use those instead. This can be a useful portability utility when such compilers become more common.

I've already suggested this (as you'll soon see in the review results email) Best, John -- http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert ... call me only if you want things done right