On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
Seen the reactions that I'm seen in this thread, I start to think that maybe I could be wrong with my decision.
[snip]
I believe that we will need this 10-day review period if no more to review the revised Fit library. This is why I'm talking of the need of a full review. I don't consider to take time to review a library a bad thing as the first goal is for me to improve the library in all its aspects.
I did not observe the Fiber review, so I can't comment on that. I also agree with Andrey (and Vladimir and Robert)'s assessment: It seemed like your intention was a rejection (for this review) but that Paul was encouraged to address some of the issues raised, resubmit for a further review - which could carry a different result) This is probably because, as you've said, a full review of the library would be required. Glen