David Abrahams wrote:
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:
I'd think that this is the right expectation for Lambda, but not for FC++ or Bind. Not that I'm helping any :)
No, I don't think so. Expressions that are valid for both Bind and Lambda should have the same semantics. And in fact, this is not just theory:
Really? I didn't figure out what the code illustrates, ...
The code illustrates that Bind can be easily enhanced to have limited lambda support.
... but my recent attempts to use Lambda have been a dismal failure, mostly because of subtle (and sometimes not-so-subtle) differences with Bind. For example, Lambda doesn't seem to support get_pointer to dereference through smart pointers. The tuple/reference issue I posted about yesterday was another obstacle.
You are just repeating my statement. There should be no differences.