I'm sorry, I meant to direct my suggestion to Gennadiy, but I lost track of whose message I had replied to. On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Ian Emmons wrote:
It is probably easier to emulate snprintf using Boost.Format. I'm not sure what requirements you have that cause you to want to continue using snprintf, but you may find that you can simply switch from snprintf to Boost.Format (with no emulation).
I believe there is confusion. As far as I'm concerned, I do not have any such requirements. It is that I was told (see comments here [1]) that Boost.Test will continue using snprintf, so I'm looking for workaround that would be acceptable for Boost.Test.
Boost.Format works for me. Does it work for Boost.Test?
[1] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3558
Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost