"Justin Gottschlich" <jgottschlich@runbox.com> wrote in message news:cvjt7a$cn2$1@sea.gmane.org... |> | "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> wrote in message | > | At this point, I'm ready to step back and say, "ok, so ... let's figure out | what we need to build." As I was discussing with Richard, I think we have | two primary trees to develop: | | 1) trees as containers | 2) trees as algorithms | | I think we need to figure out a design that is inherently inclusive to both | groups (so everyone is happy). That being said, what do you think the best | format to do that is? | | What do you think? And boy is this fun. =) I'm not sure I like the expression "trees as algorithms". I would like to see different types of iterators which can then be used to implement algorithms. So I only see trees as containers. br -Thorsten