Re: [boost] Re: [Ann] Proposed Boost.TR1 library: first completeversion now available.

So is your intention to have this stuff undergo formal review and become part of Boost? If so, is there implementation duplication, or does it somehow use common headers and source files?

I'm quite happy to have a separate review for this, but at present Hubert seems to think it's basically an extension of his special functions library (most of the algorithms are complex number versions of his hyperbolic special functions), so I'm preparing patches against that: all this new code will then end up in namespace boost::math, and the TR1 library (when it comes up for review) will just make use of that code rather than duplicating it. John.