11 Sep
2008
11 Sep
'08
12:18 a.m.
Robert Ramey:
Pete Bartlett wrote:
Sadly, by introducing boost::serialization::throw_exception, you have foisted work on me and other users of your library. Now we have to implement
boost::serialization::throw_exception instead of just having one boost::throw_exception. This is exactly the kind of breakage you've been so strongly opposed to.
You're blaming the victim here. This problem isn't caused by me, I felt I had no other reasonable alternative.
This particular problem is caused by you. There is no good technical reason to declare a separate throw_exception in another namespace for the user to implement. You should have re-declared boost::throw_exception.