26 Jun
2009
26 Jun
'09
9:20 a.m.
If you want to provide a stateful clone allocator, it would allow me to do
something like this:
If ptr_container<T> is to have stateful allocators, should it not use boost::container<T>? Currently the ptr_containers are based on the std::containers. Is there a case against using boost::container instead? Other than that Ion has not committed the new headers yet of course... Regards, Christian