20 Jul
2010
20 Jul
'10
3:23 p.m.
At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:13:09 +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Honestly, if we're going to pick a totally arbitrary name, I'd prefer leaving it alone.
I agree. The problem we're starting with is that "bjam.exe" is not correlated to "Boost.Build" at all. Replacing "bjam.exe" with something totally random will only create more confusion.
Maybe the whole system should be called bjam. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com