Re: [boost] [future] Early draft of wait for multiple futures interface

Anthony Williams-4 wrote:

...

I don't think your proposed interface is powerful enough to implement composed futures, but I might be wrong. For instance, how would you implement future operators with it?

future<bool> operator||(future<bool> lhs, future<bool> rhs);

Using wait callbacks:

is_ready doesn't trigger the callback, so this won't work. OTOH, I think is_ready should trigger the callback, even for the "run extra work in wait()" thread pool use case. Johan Johan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-future--Early-draft-of-wait-for-multiple-futures-inte... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.