11 Jul
2005
11 Jul
'05
5:26 p.m.
"Jost, Andrew" <Andrew_Jost@mentor.com> escribió en el mensaje news:8F7931C35114FA4F9D25E1A9299408E20276DFA7@SVR-ORW-EXC-06.mgc.mentorg.com...
Boost.Optional has some interaction with (including initialization from) boost::none, which seems to correspond to your "undef".
Good point, but I would also like to see overloaded == and != operators using boost::none.
That is already supported. Fernando Cacciola SciSoft