Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
Arkadiy Vertleyb ha escrito:
"Stefan Seefeld" <seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote
If the rate regressions were fixed over the last couple of weeks is any indication, getting from this high a number down towards zero will take another year or three... :-(
What happened? I thought we were down to 6 failures at some point... Are all these new failures just indication of a problem in some low-level library?
AFAIK things aren't as bad as they look:
* Scores of tests from the "Martin Wille x86_64 V2" regression runner are bogus entries due to an as of yet unresolved problem with the tool used to run the regression procedure, see http://lists.boost.org/boost-testing/2007/01/3853.php
That's false alarm, but we've tracked that down to another problem: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.testing/3895 - Volodya