27 Jun
2005
27 Jun
'05
9:54 p.m.
Chris Uzdavinis wrote:
Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger@neoscientists.org> writes:
It seems all are pretty close in terms of portability (for the former two I know it and for Kylix it's another guess reading Boost.Config), so testing for below 0x600 is what you want, I guess (and above 0x551, reading the follow-up).
If the highest released Borland compiler is 0x570, why do you suggest testing for "below 0x600"? Rounding up may inadvertantly include future compilers that don't need such workarounds.
There was a (much more compliant preview) version 0x600, once... And AFAIK 0x565 was released /after/ 0x570. Btw. I have 5.6.5 installed, in case someone needs testing.