Vicente Botet skrev:
Dear Giovanni,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Giovanni Piero Deretta <gpderetta@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, I think I might have over-emphasised the difference. Would you prefer the function overload to be in the boost::adaptors namespace, the boost namespace or something else?
I had considered creating a range adaptor to be highly different to applying an algorithm, perhaps I over-emphasised this distinction when making the decision. FWIW, I have code like this:
total = ( r | filter(_r, f) | map(_r, m) | accumulate(_r, zero, a) );
i.e. I don't have a strong distinction between adaptor and algorithms.
Yes, I'm sold!
I agree, the introduction of the parameter (_r) makes the library homogeneus. An adaptor is a functor with a placeholder for the input parameter.
I my examples I removed the _r from the syntax. I don't see the point in having them, if the code can work without them. Are they really needed? -Thorsten