8 May
2006
8 May
'06
7:39 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
"Eric Niebler" <eric@boost-consulting.com> writes:
My suggestion is that you back this change out and Thorsten applies his changes to HEAD.
Why? What other changes do you think are needed in order to make this consistent?
Anyway, now that you've reminded me of range_result_iterator, I'll be happy to roll back my change if this is breaking any code or if Thorsten asks me to.
I have a long line of changes in the pipeline which, as Eric remembers, I couldn't commit before the branch for release. It does what you I think, in the sense that range_iterator behaves like range_result_iterator do today. -Thorsten