3 May
2008
3 May
'08
11:29 a.m.
Yes, although I still maintain that it shouldn't be called a PointConcept. You show your "value" template function that does basically the same thing as boost::get.
Instead of:
brunos::value<0>(myvec);
it should be:
boost::get<0>(myvec);
IMHO...
Yes, the value<>() function will surely be renamed into get<>() in order to have a common interface with tuples. And using boost::get<>() can be made possible quite easily, I think. The big advantage is that it becomes even easier to build a point from a tuple. Bruno