Re: [boost] License and new version

At 05:42 PM 11/7/2004, Jared McIntyre wrote:

I'm guessing from reading through the 1.32 tarball docs that the this release will still have some libraries that are not under the Boost 1 license. Is this the case?

Yes, but John Maddock put in a great deal of effort contacting boost contributors, and so we are in far better shape with this release than the last one.

If so, is there a definitive list of these projects?

See http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/license_report.html It identifies every file with a potential license or copyright problem. That allows you pretty quickly to see what the license status is of any library you are interested in. --Beman