Re: [boost] SCons script for building Boost

Sergey Popov wrote:

I've searched the ML archive and found out that scons wasn't considered for adoption because nobody offered to reimplement boost build instructions in terms of SCons. Out of curiosity: As I have complained frequently and loudly to Scons developers about the lack of correct dependency checks (especially when figuring out the exact header inclusions requires a full preprocessor, as is the case for boost's MPL !), I wonder whether this is now fixed with recent SCons releases.

Thanks, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...