Re: [boost] [test] testing for strict weak ordering

David Abrahams wrote:

Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> writes:

...

Hi,

I couldn't find a way to do this. Maybe I have overlooked something. Anyway, making sure that operator<, operator== does the right thing is pretty important.

Strict weak ordering uses a single operations and does not relate two operations. Thus you can test that < imposes a strict weak ordering, but it can have nothing to do with ==. What you're testing below would need some other name.

Right. I guess both could be useful. -Thorsten