28 Apr
2005
28 Apr
'05
1:11 p.m.
"John Maddock" <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> writes:
It appears that aligned storage itself is not a POD, so the ::type is necessary.
I can't imagine what would necessitate making aligned_storage<T> not a POD. Can somebody please explain?
It has user defined constructors (to make it non-copyable), and private data. I don't know why it was done that way,
Overzealous obsession with safety, I bet.
I'm just trying to make sure that the ::type member is TR1 conforming.
BTW using aligned_storage directly like that (not going through the ::type member), is and always has been, untested and undocumented.
Oh. Well, that's fine, then. Thanks. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com