That's not a bad idea. And static_assert would be fine for "error handling" too as it's about compile-time errors. On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Emil Dotchevski <emil@revergestudios.com>wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Alp Mestan <alpmestan@gmail.com> wrote:
I think the lib can be added in Concurrent Programming, Programming Interfaces and maybe Misc. It isn't worth creating a category for it.
If we create utility group, I'm sure other libraries would be added to it. The variant library comes to mind, I see it in containers now but it isn't really a container. Other libs that can go in utility: tokenizer, static_assert, etc. The real issue is that "utility" isn't very descriptive, this is the main reason I don't like it.
Maybe we can create "error handling" group?
Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Alp Mestan --- http://blog.mestan.fr/ --- http://alp.developpez.com/ --- In charge of the Qt, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence sections on Developpez