I told that the main difference is that it allows user to in-place compose and pass lambda expressions to a functions that accept invokable entities. What's the difference with this approach and the existing boost.preprocessor's one? The same as BOOST.MPL with and WITHOUT lambda support. You can experiment with the features we talk about; I included lot's of stuff you to experiment. -----Original Message----- From: "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmut.kaiser@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:04:04 -0600 Subject: Re: [boost] [preprocessor]
here is the link to the samples: http://rapidshare.com/files/332222560/pp_demo.zip.html
read demo.txt and can test the code
Thanks! Do you have some examples highlighting the features you're referring to? Things I could try? Your library seems to heavily overlap with Boost.PP, what's different?
Regards Hartmut
--------------- Meet me at BoostCon www.boostcon.com
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
С уважением, Баграт Асатрян. ---------------------------------------------- Тел.: +(374 94) 69-78-67, E-mail: bagrat_assatrian@mail.ru