Ilya Sokolov <fal_delivery <at> mail.ru> writes:
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
2. Unfortunately original test modult function signature is unacceptable for DLL initialization. So i had to introduce new one. I don't see it unacceptable, given the majority of init_unit_test_suite() functions using BOOST_TEST_SUITE macro. I think See my other post. What post?
Look at the bottom of http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/169545
I still don't see why is it unacceptable. Can you state it explicitly?
Hmm. How to state it more explicitly. How about this: It does not link.
Problem arise with library that should work on both platforms, with and without dll support.
What platforms are you talking about? Why the solutions I provided are not satisfactory? Gennadiy