On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
Le dim 26/09/2004 ? 09:40, Aleksey Gurtovoy a ?crit :
Aleksey Gurtovoy writes:
Bronek Kozicki writes:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/numeric/interval/detail/bugs.hpp,v [...]
I tested this patch in my system (the one running regression tests for mingw-3.4.1 release candidate), it's OK. No failures in numeric/interval
Applied, thanks to everyone who helped to figure this out!
Hmm, it looks like GCC 2.95.3/STLPort didn't get covered by the patch -- http://tinyurl.com/6e3g5. Is this something we can fix easily?
I have committed a small patch. Let's see if it fixes things. I can't be sure it will work since my version of STL is 4.6 and I don't have these problems.
Guillaume, I see you've just removed the using decls for GCC 2.x - that should work fine for both libstdc++-v2 and STLPort, AFAICT (I haven't tested it). My other thought was something like this: Index: boost/numeric/interval/detail/bugs.hpp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/numeric/interval/detail/bugs.hpp,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -p -b -B -r1.12 bugs.hpp --- boost/numeric/interval/detail/bugs.hpp 23 Sep 2004 17:59:34 -0000 1.12 +++ boost/numeric/interval/detail/bugs.hpp 27 Sep 2004 12:31:17 -0000 @@ -71,9 +71,15 @@ namespace numeric { # define BOOST_NUMERIC_INTERVAL_using_max(a) # define BOOST_NUMERIC_INTERVAL_using_math(a) # ifdef BOOST_HAS_INV_HYPERBOLIC +# if defined (__SGI_STL_PORT) + using ::asinh; + using ::acosh; + using ::atanh; +# else using std::asinh; using std::acosh; using std::atanh; +# endif # undef BOOST_NUMERIC_INTERVAL_using_ahyp # define BOOST_NUMERIC_INTERVAL_using_ahyp(a) # endif But this seems to be unnecessary complication when your version should work. jon -- "Reason and free inquiry are the effectual agents against error. They are the natural enemies of error and error only." - Thomas Jefferson