2 May
2011
2 May
'11
2:48 a.m.
On 5/1/2011 7:02 PM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
I'm not concerned with how cycles are being broken.
My question is, is there anything that protects all objects within a cycle from being able to dereference a pointer to an object from the cycle after that object has already been destroyed?
A block_ptr pointing to a cyclic object that has been destroyed will be nullified. It won't be dereferenced. -Phil