1 Apr
2010
1 Apr
'10
4:13 p.m.
on 01.04.2010 at 4:10 Chad Nelson wrote :
i vote for quiet NaN since operations are throwing already by default but actually the original design was sane too for example
xint::integer i; while ((i = foo())==NaN) //doing some important work ask_user_what_to_do(); //failed! worth it to try again?
i think this is conscious [...]
If you mean, you think it was a conscious decision on my part: yes, you're right. That's how I intended it to be used. indeed my point was that the use case described in the example seems to be perfectly conscious
our views on this library appear to be curiously close... -- Pavel P.S. if you notice a grammar mistake or weird phrasing in my message please point it out