Hello, In 2005 David Abrahams presented its implementation of move semantics. In Jul 24, 2006 Ion Gaztañaga posted http://www.nabble.com/-move-semantics--Do-we-have-any-plan-for-move-semantic... Since then there is some Boost libraries that use this implementation internnally (I'm thinking of course on Boost.Interprocess, Boost.Thread), but each one changing the namespace. In addition Boost.Thread has an internal move class with a simplified implementation intendeed for the same sematics. This make very difficult to interact between different libraries using the same concept but with a different name. In addition there is a risk that these implementation diverge. Even if the implementation is only an emulation ot the C++0x move semantics, this should be better than nothing? I'd like to reiterate the Ion question, "Do we have any plan for move semantics emulation ?" Best regards _____________________ Vicente Juan Botet Escriba