1 May
2006
1 May
'06
4:43 p.m.
"bwood" <brass@mailvault.com> wrote in message news:20060430224509.D6A9CB65560@gateway.mailvault.com...
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
You've been touting multi_index here as well.
Not at all. If you follow my recent concern with multi_index design I actually believe it's lacking.
I read those and was sympathetic to the terminology arguments you made. L?pez Mu?oz believes it is too late to make those sort of changes. I disagree with him on that, but it isn't clear enough yet to me what would be better terminology. I didn't follow the other matter you raised in those posts.
My point was that we need another level of indirection an in-Order indexing (along with different orders for the same data). Gennadiy