Beman Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Neil Groves <neil@grovescomputing.com> wrote:
The regression test results have not detected new regressions, however there are a number of the new features that are not passing unit tests on several compilers. Since the new features would not be usable if I did not merge my opinion is that it is worth merging to allow the use of the newer features on more compliant compilers. In the meantime I can seek to improve the support of adaptors and algorithms on the less capable compilers.
A few of the new tests are failing on both VC10 and GCC 4.4 in c++0x mode due to ambiguities between boost::next and std::next, which can be fixed by qualifying the calls. I've attached a patch to https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3593 . -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A--range--Permission-to-merge-to-the-Release-branc... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.