15 Sep
2005
15 Sep
'05
10:19 p.m.
Daniel Frey wrote:
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Could we agree on a naming scheme/implementation scheme for the customization-points?
I prefer
range_begin() range_end() range_size()
to
boost_range_begin() boost_range_end() boost_range_size()
and think these identifiers are unique enough, the small amout of global costomization-points taken into consideration.
I'd like to comment on a more general point than just the names:
If we offer customizations points for a specific library, why should we use ADL at all?
You might want to read the recent threads "[serialization] Doc problems", "[range] How to extend Boost.Range?" and the threads mentioned there. Jonathan