25 Nov
2008
25 Nov
'08
9:29 p.m.
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Andrew Sutton skrev:
I think this is the right answer (and pretty well argued by now). The behavior of the iterator_range should "inherit" (is there a better word for this?) its semantics from the underlying iterator. To do otherwise would impose requirements on iterators that may not (easily) support those semantics, making the concept less generic (as in represents fewer possible implementations).
Well, it is fairly easy to remove some of the debug-checks from the code. Do I understand you correctly in that you want them all removed?
I think, at least these members should not have asserts: empty() begin() end() and maybe: equal() operator== operator!= But I'm less confident about the latter three.