27 May
2005
27 May
'05
8:51 a.m.
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
Jonathan Wakely <cow@compsoc.man.ac.uk> writes:
Attached patch implements the idea I proposed below, in case it's wanted.
Now that I look at it, I guess its effectiveness will be vastly reduced if we don't implement naming consistency for vc6 and 7, right?
Yes, definitely. And how about extending this (or coming up with another scheme) so that it equally applies to all tool sets? Because my next question would be: How do I build for GCC 3.3.3 and 3.4.X? And does "cw" really apply to CW6, 7, 8, and 9???
[...]
Schobi -- SpamTrap@gmx.de is never read I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org "Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving" Terry Pratchett