29 Aug
2004
29 Aug
'04
4:57 a.m.
Jeff Garland wrote:
[...] 1) The review schedule is too aggressive. One week per review with no breaks is going to kill us and not give enough time for complete reviews. 1.5 weeks with .5 weeks in-between is more doable. This also gives some buffer for review run-overs. The current week is a reasonable exception because we have 2 libraries that overlap the same area. [...]
I'll second the idea that more time is not a bad thing. ;)
4) These periodic reports are great -- keep up the good work!
And I'll second this sentiment as well. Dave