19 Apr
2011
19 Apr
'11
1:05 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, Edward Diener wrote:
My pick is to use what the language currently provides, which is wchar_t, which can represent UTF-16, a popular Unicode variant which also happens to be the standard for wide characters on Windows, which just happens to be the dominant operating system in the world ( by alot ) in terms of end-users.
I thought the standard was pretty loose about wchar_t, and that it could even legally be a single byte in size? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2tiKgACgkQ5vihyNWuA4U+CACgiGdC1ifFlWJ79gMg6+F6NbBB DVIAn0OPMucdhZI9W10qQiyer1AmQp7s =BF9O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----