Re: [boost] Report from Berlin C++ Standards Committee meeting

Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval@yahoo.com> writes:

David Abrahams wrote:

...

optional<T> string_to<T>(x)

seems more likely.

Yes, looks good. What is the status of optional<T> w.r.t to the standard, anyway? I hope it's on its way...

Same old story. Write a proposal, please. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com