On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 12:48 -0500, David Abrahams wrote:
christopher diggins <cdiggins@videotron.ca> writes:
[snip]
Well, now Joel and Jeff Garland have both told me by private mail that there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with having a discussion about what's worth voting for, and I am basically convinced. I think certain aspects of the logo are more important than others and should be considered. But before I start blurting out any specifics, let's hear from the group. Is there any reason we shouldn't talk about how to choose? We do almost everything at boost by public consensus. Why not this time?
I think it would be a good thing. If people are influenced by it will be no different than the review process. I also have no problem with the running tally. /ikh