13 Aug
2008
13 Aug
'08
8:42 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
on Wed Aug 13 2008, "Stjepan Rajko" <stipe-AT-asu.edu> wrote:
BTW, I just extended the fusion-based solution to also support that syntax.
Well, at the time we redesigned the library, I encouraged Daniel Wallin to look into whether we could gain anything by using fusion, because the fundamental data structure we use is like a fusion map. He said we couldn't gain anything significant, and at the time I took his word for it.
I still stand by that. The map-lookup code in the library is really the simple part. Yes, using fusion for it *might* simplify the code, but it would also make our portability worse and likely increase the compile times. -- Daniel Wallin BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com